JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Francisco Ignacio Herrera Gutierrez Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Acumulacion De Procesos De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuanto la solicitud se presentó después de realizado el reparto de los expedientes
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de acumulación de expedientes.

Se pidió a la Corporación acumular varias demandas de inconstitucionalidad, por cuanto en las mismas se acusaron las mismas normas legales.

La Sala constató que la petición se presentó con posterioridad al reparto de los expedientes y que éstos se encuentran surtiendo distintas etapas procedimentales.

Se DENIEGA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de acumulacion del expediente D-13273 a los radicados bajo los numeros D-13284, D-13285 y D-13286, formulada por los ciudadanos Maria del Mar Arciniegas Perea y Juan Esteban Sanin Gomez.
  2. SEGUNDO. INFORMAR al solicitante que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno, de conformidad con lo establecido en el inciso 2 del articulo 49 del Acuerdo 02 de 2015.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.